An Interesting Comparison

Fr. Richard McBrien of the theology department of my alma mater, the University of Notre Dame, has this interesting article in the current edition of the National Catholic Reporter.

UPDATE: The link I provided to McBrien's article required a subscription - here's what many of your were unable to open:

Between the Two Extremes

By RICHARD P. McBRIEN

No matter how many times church authorities address the matter of homosexuality and ministry to gays and lesbians, it never seems to come out right. Ultraconservatives are satisfied with nothing less than absolute condemnation, exclusion of gays from seminaries, and, if they had the means, expulsion of gays from the priesthood and the hierarchy. Those on the extreme left are satisfied with nothing less than a moral embrace of homosexuality as something as “normal” as heterosexuality and a condemnation of anything other than that embrace as a virulent form of homophobia.

The debate between the two sides closely resembles the recent debate over immigration reform in the United States. One extreme opposes all forms of “amnesty” under whatever guise and favors -- without offering a practical means of implementation -- the expulsion of the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants. The other extreme favors the immediate legalization of the 12 million but offers no practical solution to the problem of the seemingly endless flow of illegal immigrants into the country. If some compromise is created eventually on immigration reform legislation, those involved in the parallel debate about homosexuality ought to take notice. In the meantime, we have to do the best we can.

Even when some of our bishops who are unencumbered by rigid ideology attempt to address this thorny issue, their statements are usually filed away, never to surface again. Two years ago I did a column in praise of Bishop J. Terry Steib of Memphis, Tenn., who had announced in his diocesan newspaper that he was inaugurating a new ministry to gay and lesbian Catholics “to be sure that we do not leave anyone behind,” and to make clear that “all are welcome in their own home.” “It is no secret,” I wrote in my column, “that any discussion of homosexuality -- particularly one without the standard condemnations -- makes many people uncomfortable, inside and outside the church. It is also no secret that those who write and speak as Bishop Terry Steib has done are perceived by many others as a threat to the faith itself. In fact, Bishop Steib’s initiative was viewed as so much of a threat that the editor of the weekly paper in a nearby diocese was explicitly forbidden by his own bishop to publish anything about Bishop Steib’s column and his inauguration of a diocesan ministry of outreach to gay and lesbian Catholics.”

Around the same time, an openly gay priest was ordered by his provincial to excise a reference to his sexual orientation in a book that he was about to publish on Catholic spirituality. The subsequent reviews were uniformly positive and the book itself received a few awards. That would almost certainly not have been the case if the reference had remained in the text. Not too long beforehand, a high-ranking Vatican spokesman, who has since retired, suggested that homosexuals cannot validly be ordained. “Wherever the fault might lie,” my column concluded, “many gay and lesbian Catholics feel like strangers in their own home -- unwelcome and looked down upon, just as Bishop Terry Steib had said. If there were more bishops like him, that situation would surely begin to change.” Almost two years later, there is no evidence that it has.

Bishop Gerald Kicanas of Tucson, Ariz., is the latest to try his pastoral hand at dealing with the presence of gays and lesbians in the church. Like Bishop Steib, Bishop Kicanas expressed himself in his diocesan newspaper. He noted approvingly that unlike in earlier years, “homosexuality is out of the shadows.” He also acknowledged that he has encountered the same extreme positions on the issue that were cited above. The church is still accused of being either too harsh or too tolerant. While agreeing with most people that ministry to gays and lesbians needs to be compassionate, Bishop Kicanas now believes that “we should be doing more.” In pursuit of the “more,” the bishop has met with a group of pastoral leaders and parishioners to reflect on the matter, after which he pledged to continue to explore ways to make clear to everyone that the good news of Jesus Christ is for all people, that each person is a child of God, deserving of respect and dignity, and that “there are no gradations within God’s family: All are his beloved daughters and sons.”

But the unspoken question remains unanswered: If God created these “beloved” daughters and sons with a homosexual orientation, how can the church be so sure that God also gave them the charism for lifelong celibacy?

Fr. Richard McBrien is the Crowley-O’Brien professor of theology at the University of Notre Dame.
National Catholic Reporter, July 20, 2007

McBrien raises a concern that many pastors and parishioners face. It may be that McBrien's take on the issues is too simple, or its simplicity may recommend it for our consideration. Certainly the questions of how we welcome immigrants and how we Catholics welcome our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters are both issues with moral content.

What do you think?