12/18/07

Luke, Matthew, Mark or John?

There are some interesting remarks in the combox in the post below on the Nativity scene about to rise up in St. Peter's Square in Rome.

I'll take the occasion to offer an extra-credit homework assignment to round out our Advent time and to prepare us for Easter. Pick up your bible or read below the Nativity narratives in the gospels. We'll begin with Luke's account of Christ's birth, the one with which we are most familiar.

Just a few days ago a faithful parishioner told me that until she had seen last year's movie, The Nativity Story, she never knew why Mary and Joseph had traveled to Bethlehem. Do you know? What surprises might you find in these accounts - and in comparing them?



The icons of the four evangelists are the work of Peter Wilke

Luke
Chapter 2
(preceded in Chapter 1 by the story of Zechariah, Elizabeth, and their son, John the Baptist; and the story of the angel appearing to Mary, the Mother of Jesus, announcing that she will conceive by the Holy Spirit.)
1
1 In those days a decree went out from Caesar Augustus 2 that the whole world should be enrolled.
2
This was the first enrollment, when Quirinius was governor of Syria.
3
So all went to be enrolled, each to his own town.
4
And Joseph too went up from Galilee from the town of Nazareth to Judea, to the city of David that is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and family of David,
5
to be enrolled with Mary, his betrothed, who was with child.
6
While they were there, the time came for her to have her child,
7
and she gave birth to her firstborn son. 3 She wrapped him in swaddling clothes and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn.
8
4 Now there were shepherds in that region living in the fields and keeping the night watch over their flock.
9
The angel of the Lord appeared to them and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were struck with great fear.
10
The angel said to them, "Do not be afraid; for behold, I proclaim to you good news of great joy that will be for all the people.
11
5 For today in the city of David a savior has been born for you who is Messiah and Lord.
12
And this will be a sign for you: you will find an infant wrapped in swaddling clothes and lying in a manger."
13
And suddenly there was a multitude of the heavenly host with the angel, praising God and saying:
14
6 "Glory to God in the highest and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests."
15
When the angels went away from them to heaven, the shepherds said to one another, "Let us go, then, to Bethlehem to see this thing that has taken place, which the Lord has made known to us."
16
So they went in haste and found Mary and Joseph, and the infant lying in the manger.
17
When they saw this, they made known the message that had been told them about this child.
18
All who heard it were amazed by what had been told them by the shepherds.
19
And Mary kept all these things, reflecting on them in her heart.
20
Then the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all they had heard and seen, just as it had been told to them.
21
When eight days were completed for his circumcision, 7 he was named Jesus, the name given him by the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
22
8 When the days were completed for their purification 9 according to the law of Moses, they took him up to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord,
23
just as it is written in the law of the Lord, "Every male that opens the womb shall be consecrated to the Lord,"
24
and to offer the sacrifice of "a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons," in accordance with the dictate in the law of the Lord.
25
Now there was a man in Jerusalem whose name was Simeon. This man was righteous and devout, awaiting the consolation of Israel, 10 and the holy Spirit was upon him.
26
It had been revealed to him by the holy Spirit that he should not see death before he had seen the Messiah of the Lord.
27
He came in the Spirit into the temple; and when the parents brought in the child Jesus to perform the custom of the law in regard to him,
28
he took him into his arms and blessed God, saying:
29
"Now, Master, you may let your servant go in peace, according to your word,
30
for my eyes have seen your salvation,
31
which you prepared in sight of all the peoples,
32
a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and glory for your people Israel."
33
The child's father and mother were amazed at what was said about him;
34
and Simeon blessed them and said to Mary his mother, "Behold, this child is destined for the fall and rise of many in Israel, and to be a sign that will be contradicted
35
(and you yourself a sword will pierce) 11 so that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed."
36
There was also a prophetess, Anna, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher. She was advanced in years, having lived seven years with her husband after her marriage,
37
and then as a widow until she was eighty-four. She never left the temple, but worshiped night and day with fasting and prayer.
38
And coming forward at that very time, she gave thanks to God and spoke about the child to all who were awaiting the redemption of Jerusalem.
39
When they had fulfilled all the prescriptions of the law of the Lord, they returned to Galilee, to their own town of Nazareth.
40
The child grew and became strong, filled with wisdom; and the favor of God was upon him.



Matthew

Chapter 1
(Preceded by the genealogy of Jesus)
18
6 Now this is how the birth of Jesus Christ came about. When his mother Mary was betrothed to Joseph, 7 but before they lived together, she was found with child through the holy Spirit.
19
Joseph her husband, since he was a righteous man, 8 yet unwilling to expose her to shame, decided to divorce her quietly.
20
Such was his intention when, behold, the angel of the Lord 9 appeared to him in a dream and said, "Joseph, son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary your wife into your home. For it is through the holy Spirit that this child has been conceived in her.
21
She will bear a son and you are to name him Jesus, 10 because he will save his people from their sins."
22
All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet:
23
11 "Behold, the virgin shall be with child and bear a son, and they shall name him Emmanuel," which means "God is with us."
24
When Joseph awoke, he did as the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took his wife into his home.
25
He had no relations with her until she bore a son, 12 and he named him Jesus.
Chapter 2
1
1 When Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea, in the days of King Herod, 2 behold, magi from the east arrived in Jerusalem,
2
saying, "Where is the newborn king of the Jews? We saw his star 3 at its rising and have come to do him homage."
3
When King Herod heard this, he was greatly troubled, and all Jerusalem with him.
4
Assembling all the chief priests and the scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Messiah was to be born. 4
5
They said to him, "In Bethlehem of Judea, for thus it has been written through the prophet:
6
'And you, Bethlehem, land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; since from you shall come a ruler, who is to shepherd my people Israel.'"
7
Then Herod called the magi secretly and ascertained from them the time of the star's appearance.
8
He sent them to Bethlehem and said, "Go and search diligently for the child. When you have found him, bring me word, that I too may go and do him homage."
9
After their audience with the king they set out. And behold, the star that they had seen at its rising preceded them, until it came and stopped over the place where the child was.
10
They were overjoyed at seeing the star,
11
5 and on entering the house they saw the child with Mary his mother. They prostrated themselves and did him homage. Then they opened their treasures and offered him gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh.
12
And having been warned in a dream not to return to Herod, they departed for their country by another way.
13
6 When they had departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, "Rise, take the child and his mother, flee to Egypt, 7 and stay there until I tell you. Herod is going to search for the child to destroy him."
14
Joseph rose and took the child and his mother by night and departed for Egypt.
15
8 He stayed there until the death of Herod, that what the Lord had said through the prophet might be fulfilled, "Out of Egypt I called my son."
16
When Herod realized that he had been deceived by the magi, he became furious. He ordered the massacre of all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had ascertained from the magi.
17
Then was fulfilled what had been said through Jeremiah the prophet:
18
9 "A voice was heard in Ramah, sobbing and loud lamentation; Rachel weeping for her children, and she would not be consoled, since they were no more."
19
When Herod had died, behold, the angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt
20
and said, "Rise, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who sought the child's life are dead." 10
21
He rose, took the child and his mother, and went to the land of Israel.
22
But when he heard that Archelaus was ruling over Judea in place of his father Herod, 11 he was afraid to go back there. And because he had been warned in a dream, he departed for the region of Galilee.
23
12 He went and dwelt in a town called Nazareth, so that what had been spoken through the prophets might be fulfilled, "He shall be called a Nazorean."




Mark
There is no Nativity narrative in the Gospel of Mark.





John
There is no Nativity narrative in the Gospel of John.

7 comments:

  1. I do not understand why they would depict the story different then the bible. They mention his birthplace as Bethlehem, but are showing Nazareth regardless- why? If people are not being respectful to the traditional nativity scene, do they really think that they are going to put away Elvis? Maybe they will just put a tool in his hand and make him look like an apprentice.

    Maybe I am not the person to comment on this because I am not usually good with change of tradition, but there are so many other changes that need to be looked at and I just do not get the real point of this. The most complete depiction of the birth of Jesus is through the book of Luke.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with what Teacher says. It's one thing to have the infant Jesus in a carpenter shop, which I think is OK. But, to arbitrarily change the birthplace to Nazareth, in my opinion, is a major error. The Pope signed off on this? Doesn't the Infallibility of the Pope have something to do with keeping the integrity of the Scriptures? I admire our Popes' great intellect, but something seems amiss here.

    On the other hand, if they are trying to depict Jesus back from Egypt (toddler or young child?), then it isn't really a Nativity Scene, is it?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with what Teacher says. It's one thing to have the infant Jesus in a carpenter shop, which I think is OK. But, to arbitrarily change the birthplace to Nazareth, in my opinion, is a major error. The Pope signed off on this? Doesn't the Infallibility of the Pope have something to do with keeping the integrity of the Scriptures? I admire our Popes' great intellect, but something seems amiss here.

    On the other hand, if they are trying to depict Jesus back from Egypt (toddler or young child?), then it isn't really a Nativity Scene, is it?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Where to begin!

    1) Papal infallibility does not extend to one's choice in arranging nativity scenes. No matter of faith or morals is at stake in this decision.

    2) The Vatican is not trying to "change" the place of Jesus' birth but rather to show yet another scene in the life of Christ: the Holy Family settled in Nazareth (as Matthew and Luke both tells us). Mary's purification would have been 40 days after Jesus' birth, so within two to three months, the family would have been in Nazareth, according to Luke.

    3)Many of us are confident that Jesus was born in a stable or a cave. Our confidence, however, is not based in scriptural evidence since neither Matthew nor Luke mention a stable or a cave. Those are images we find in art, not in scripture.

    3) It's possible, too, that we may be unintentionally misled by how a word in Luke is translated: inn. The Greek word. καταλυμα (kataluma) may be translated as either “inn” or “guestroom”, and scholars suggested that Joseph and Mary may have sought to stay with relatives, rather than in an inn, only to find the house full (whereupon they resorted to the shelter of a room with a manger). The gospels use the word καταλυμα on two other occasions (once in Luke 22:11 and the other in Mark 14:14) to describe the place where Jesus will eat the Passover with his disciples: "a large furnished upper story room within a private house". Later, when Luke 10:34 does mention an actual inn, he uses the word πανδοχειον (pandocheion) not καταλυμα indicating he meant different buildings.

    Many Christian scholars accept that Jesus was placed in a manger, as homes in that period commonly had mangers built inside them for animals kept indoors (a carved stone trough rather than the wooden one often depicted), and that Joseph and Mary stayed in a ground floor room in a private house owned by relatives as the upper rooms normally offered to guests were occupied.

    4) I'm not sure on what basis we would judge which is the more complete version of the Nativity. In Luke there are no visitors from the east, no flight into Egypt, and no slaughter of the innocents. If Luke is the more complete version, would we be prepared to remove the "three kings" from our nativity scenes?

    5) As you can see, our "traditional" notion of what the Navitity scene should include draws on both Matthew and Luke who provide different details.

    6)Neither Matthew nor Luke were at the Navitity taking notes for writing their gospels. These two texts are dated some 40-60 years after the death and resurrection of Christ. In both cases, it's important to study how the infancy narrative in each fits into, complements and supports the rest of the gospel. And of course it's of interest that Mark and John contain no infancy narrative at all.

    6) As Grace pointed out in the combox in the previous post, all of these details are far less important than the great truth they communicate: that Jesus was born for us, loved us and saved us.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I imagine if Caesar Augustus sent out a decree that all should be enrolled, Joseph would have complied by going to Bethlehem. I don't believe citizens of the Roman Empire would have dared not to comply with the Emperor. The decree I assume is historical fact. Then the question would be, "Was Jesus born in Nazareth prior to or after this decree?," in which case Mary and Jesus might have accompanied Joseph or maybe not. (Were all family members required to go?) If Jesus were born in Nazareth, the shepherds, angels, wise men, star in the East, etc., would have come to Nazareth, rather than to Bethlehem. I read in LIFE magazine years ago that there was some galatic event at the time of Jesus's birth that could have accounted for the Star in the East that led the Wise Men. I believe the same article depicted a natural event that could have caused the parting of the Red Sea. At any rate I guess we will never know now whether Jesus was born in Nazareth or Bethlehem. A pope has only spoken infallibly twice: the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption. So I don't expect an infallible statement on the birthplace of Jesus coming from Rome. Maybe Elvis will be in the carpenter shop singing "Blue Christmas." Would serve them right whoever made this decision to change the birthplace of Jesus! Bah humbug!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Concord Pastor,

    It's not so much as rearranging Nativity scenes as placing the birthplace in Nazareth when both the Gospel of Matthew and Luke say Jesus was born in Bethlehem that I don't understand. It just doesn't make sense to me why they would change the birthplace. Why not just say Joseph's carpenter shop is in Bethlehem?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Daisy assumes incorrectly about the historicity of Caesar's decree that the whole world be enrolled.

    Luke's gospel is the only extant document in history which mentions such a census. It is hihgly unlikely that the emperor would order a census of the whole empire and that only Luke would take note of it.

    There is also no historical record of the immense dislocations that would have occured if every family, at the same time, was required to return to the home of a remote ancestor.

    Most scholars put the actual birth of Christ at around 4 B.C. which was about 10 years before the census of Quirinius.

    There was, however, a census taken of Judea, Samaria and Idumea, but not Galilee where Luke locates Joseph and Mary. Quirinius did, at this time, conduct a census of Syria.

    What's at issue here is how we understand and interpret scripture. We need to let go of the notion that Luke's and Matthew's account are ancient articles from the Jerusalem Daily News. Rather, their texts are faith testimonies with a message to preach.

    Finally, and one more time: No one is trying to ""change the birthplace of Jesus" - least of all in Rome. To depict another setting in the life of the child Jesus while we celebrate the feast of his birth is not an attempt to change or correct the scriptures.

    Anyone may certainly object to the setting about to be unveiled, but let's name it for what it is.

    ReplyDelete

Please THINK before you write
and PRAY before you think!