11/24/09

US women religious and the apostolic visitation


Bishop Robert Finn of Kansas City with Sisters
celebrating their jubilee year of profession in religious life;
I chose this photo because it offers a sweep of ways in which women religious dress these days.

I've posted twice (here and here) on the Vatican's three year study of American congregations of women religious. A portion of that study included questionnaires sent to the heads of these congregations which were deadlined for return on November 20. In response to negative reaction to the questionnaire, some elements of it were recently changed. Here's a link to the official Apostolic Visitation website.

And here's NCR's latest report on the progress of the visitation:

The vast majority of U.S. women religious are not complying with a Vatican request to answer questions in a document of inquiry that is part of a three-year study of the congregations. Leaders of congregations, instead, are leaving questions unanswered or sending in letters or copies of their communities' constitutions.

"There's been almost universal resistance," said one women religious familiar with the responses compiled by the congregation leaders. "We are saying 'enough!' In my 40 years in religious life I have never seen such unanimity."

The deadline for the questionnaires to be filled out and returned to the Vatican-appointed apostolic visitator, superior general of the Apostles of the Sacred Heart of Jesus, Mother Mary Clare Millea, was Nov. 20. On that day, according to an informed source, congregation leaders across the nation sent Millea letters and, in many cases, only partial answers to the questionnaire. Many women, instead of filling out the forms, replied by sending in copies of their Vatican-approved orders' religious constitutions. A religious order's constitution states its rationale, purpose and mission.

The Vatican initiated the study in January, saying its purpose is to determine the quality of life in religious communities, given the decline in vocations in recent decades. From the outset, the women have complained they were never consulted before Vatican officials announced the investigation and there is no transparency in the process. Some have called the effort demeaning and intrusive.

The decisions by congregation leaders not to comply follow nearly two months of intensive discussions both inside and across religious congregations. They follow consultations with civil and canon lawyers, and come in the wake of what some women religious see as widespread support by laity for their church missions.

With about half of the responses from the nation's 59,000 women religious accounted for, only about one percent answered, as directed, most or all of the questions contained in the study's working paper, officially called an Instrumentum Laboris, according to one informed source.

By contrast, according to the source, congregations representing, by far, the greater majority of women religious decided not to comply and answered only a few, or none, of the questions. Many of the 340 U.S. apostolic congregation heads instead sent letters to Millea stating that what they were sending was what the Vatican was looking for.

(Read the complete article)

Some of the commentary this story will occasion is fairly predictable. What interests me is the way in which the response of the women religious to the Vatican, to authority, might offer a case study from which the Church at large might grow in its understanding of how ecclesial life is best evaluated and conflict resolved.

-ConcordPastor

21 comments:

  1. I am truly impressed with these women and their courage! Their response was intelligent and very charitable. God bless you all!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I admire the women religious who have the integrity to stand up for themselves. The questions ARE offensive. The outcome of the investigation is to be confidential, so how can that possibly help the sisters to improve their "quality of life?" The Vatican wants to see how the sisters are adhering to their letter of the law. The sisters are not going along with the "old boys' network" so they have to be investigated. Finally, maybe the hierarchy will recognize them for what they are worth.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So the sisters chose "Non serviam" as their reply. I am sure Mother Mary Clare Millea is disappointed but not surprised at the insubordinate and insulting response of many of these women leaders. God forbid they had a real job and tried that tactic with the home office! The lesson for the church at large: focus on the vibrant, young communities which are sprouting up. If I were in charge,I'd cut off church funding of the orders that were not in compliance.

    Irish Gal

    ReplyDelete
  4. CP,

    Thank you for posting this in your blog. You are helping all who read to be current in what is happening in our church.

    I have received much in being educated by the nuns. They have given their lives in service to God and to all of us in the Body of Christ. They are now outstanding examples of how we are we are to care for ALL,including the poorest of the poor, the weak, those rejected, the lost. This is the heart of the Gospel message of Jesus to all of us.

    As the NCR article states, they have taken the path of "nonviolent resistance" and that was done after much prayer, discussions within their communities and with those of other orders and their canon lawyers.

    This response to me is God-inspired and one we all need to reflect on for our growth in effecting needed change in our own lives and that of the Church.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Change comes from within - a message that is made quite clearly as we prepare to enter Advent.

    And faith springs from within.

    Religion on the other hand comes from without.

    This polarity is worth noting as we all, the sisters included, try to live in the container that is created by these two seemingly opposite things.

    It is about dyanamics and less linear than we might believe. The etymology of obedience is to listen. I posit that the sisters who resist may be obedient in that way, as they listen to the voice within and without.

    Fran

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow! That is a tough stance to take, Irish Gal!! "God forbid they had a real job" You have got to be kidding!!

    One of the many things to be thankful for tomorrow is the devoted service of our religious community of women who serve so selflessly to benefit the rest of us.

    Happy Thanksgiving to All!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think the issue goes far beyond the evaluation of ecclesial life. The broader question is, how do we resolve conflict?

    The underlying issue here is abuse of power by the hierarchy. They fear they have lost control and are trying desperately to re-establish “order”.

    There are so many parallels between how the nuns, the victims of sexual abuse, and the parishioners who have had their parishes closed have been treated by the hierarchy. This applies to a lesser degree to priests and the laity, in general.

    They have not been treated with respect; they have not been consulted in decisions that affect them directly. They have been “acted upon”. The processes they were submitted to were unfair, unjust, lack transparency, are demeaning and intrusive.

    Powerless in the existing church structures, unable to get due process within the church structure, all of these victims have sought external counsel from civil and canon lawyers to protect themselves from the unchecked power of the hierarchy.

    The hierarchy uses intimidation and fear to control their victims. Most victims are afraid to speak up or be identified, for fear of reprisals. The canon lawyers wouldn’t even comment for the NCR story, out of fear. The Vatican is always looking for someone else to pay the costs for their escapades, ultimately that’s the laity, which is always the funding source.

    This is a grass roots response. At the beginning of all of these processes, the victims feel isolated, discuss the issues among themselves, hold meetings, consult outside resources, and through the discernment process, grow into common resolve to address the problem head on. They have all said, “enough”. All were looking for the solution that lies between, “Take the abuse and offer it up, or kill the abuser.”

    Pope John Paul II and Benedict XVI have tried to reverse Vatican II. But the genie is already out of the bottle. They want nuns and lay people to work within the existing church structures. However, those structures render the “non-hierarchs” powerless and they are no longer willing to accept that place.

    Cardinal Rode is wrong to name VII as “the greatest crisis, the first truly global crisis.” The greatest, first truly global crisis is the clergy sexual abuse crisis. It showed the corruption in the hierarchy and the true nature of the existing church power structures.

    It caused all thinking people to ask, how can our leaders have done this? Is this what Jesus intended his church to be? What can I do to change this?

    Sadly, they have discovered they have no power in the existing structure. Some of us are beginning to act like adults in our faith. We are saying that this abuse of power is unjust, unacceptable.

    The clergy sexual abuse crisis is the catalyst. It started the questioning. It’s the reason the bishops have lost their moral authority, by their own hands.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fran, Do you believe that the leaders of congregations who refused to answer questions posed them on the quality of their religious life were listening to the Holy Spirit? Could you give any other examples of principled disobedience to the Church?

    And Father Fleming, given that you knew the commentary would be predictable, why go down that road? If you're interested in the way the response might offer a case study, why don't you post your own thoughts on this point?

    Irish Gal

    ReplyDelete
  9. It will be interesting to see how this does play out. I do think the sisters' response to the visitation will provide a good case study. Many of the congregations are not in agreement with the approach that has been taken by the hierarchy. They have had the courage to resist what they feel is unjust. How this will translate to other areas of disagreement between the laity and the hierarchy remains to be seen. I salute the sisters for their bravery.

    Rosemary

    ReplyDelete
  10. Among the many things congregations of women religious have to offer the Church is their history over the past 50 years of taking great care to develop and live by community government which both recognizes the ministry of a congregation's superiors and painstakingly seeks the advice and counsel of those in the community. As I've observed this, they've moved away from "either/or" on the question of authority to "both/and."

    Has this methodology been foolproof? Of course not. Does it offer a half-century of effort to develop a structure for governing that has much to offer? I believe so. Is it the answer to all the Church's concerns? No. Is it worth our respect and study? Yes.

    Michael, above, frames some of this with a sharper edge than I'm inclined to hone. (I don't think making one side the baddest guy in town makes the other side the better guy -or gal.) But at heart of what Michael writes is, I believe, a desire not necessarily to arrive at different conclusions but to find better ways to discover what the conclusions might be.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Might be a good time for all of us to take a short refresher course in the guidelines for comments posted on my sidebar.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jemma,

    Yes, a real job in the real world. Not a world in which one is safe acting on one's own desires to become, say, an escort at an abortion clinic all the while keeping hold of the name and the financial support of a Church that abhors abortion. If I owned a McDonald's and decided that eating beef was morally wrong -- if I replaced the burgers on my menu with tofu -- should I then fight to keep my "rightful" place under the Golden Arches? Claim the McDonald's name while working against its interests? That wouldn't work in the real world. It's not morally admirable, either, as far as I can tell, to take a vow of obedience, then chuck it when you disagree with those whom you've pledged to serve.

    Is answering a questionnaire a form of martyrdom? Today is the feast of St. Catherine of Alexandria. Pondering those who gave their very lives for the faith may lend some perspective.

    As for Michael's contribution, CP, I disagree. He views every topic through the lens of the sex abuse crisis, and injects it into virtually every conversation. That is not especially helpful. I have been on this blog since the beginning, and remember all the revolutionary rhetoric of the early posts (even the lost posts of September 07, which are on my hard drive somewhere). The conversation has not advanced much.

    Irish Gal

    ReplyDelete
  13. A retraction, CP: Can't find the Sept. '07 comments. That lost month may stay lost.

    IG

    ReplyDelete
  14. It would seem like the Vatican's retraction of some of their more controversial questions from their investigative study of American sisters is a reaction to what is widely perceived by the laity as yet another PR disaster. A report whose results are to be kept confidential from its very participants as well as the Church at large ~ how can this be possibly be construed as relating to the sisters' "quality of life?" Should not that issue be approached through open dialogue, conversation, and prayer? I cannot help but wince in embarrassment and sadness that the Vatican feels compelled to scrutinize these women of faith, courage, and integrity in a closed and secretive way. Call me a Pollyanna, but what would be the harm in Church leaders standing in solidarity and celebration of the accomplishments and contributions to our church of sisters who have devoted their lives to education, parish ministries, health care, the poor, homeless, elderly, grieving, immigrants, missions, etc., etc? What these remarkable women deserve is the Church's grateful thanks, support, prayers, and blessing ~ not a confidential questionnaire whose stated motives seem questionable at best.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It's been suggested that the point of view in this link will shed light on the questions raised by this post.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Irish Gal says, "I'd cut off church funding of the orders that were not in compliance." It's important to realize that there is no "church funding" for religious congregations. They have to support themselves financially.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The orders in question solicit funds claiming the Catholic name and mantle. Some obtain money from Catholic parish collections, like the CCHD (which until recently sent money to ACORN) which is administered by the bishops. Many operate in subsidized positions or on subsidized Church property (free use of underutilized facilities, below-market rent of others).

    IG

    ReplyDelete
  18. I've never heard of religious congregations receiving money from the CCHD, and would appreciate knowing where you got that information. I've also never heard of religious receiving money from parish collections, except for the once-a-year voluntary contribution to the Retirement Fund for Religious. (Does your parish take up a collection for religious congregations or orders at other times?) And what is a "subsidized position"? Do you mean sisters or religious priests who work for a parish or for the diocese and earn a salary?

    What I find most hurtful, however, is the assumption I find in many blog comments that we are all unfaithful. As for myself, I must rely every day on the mercy and grace of God and on the goodness of my religious community, as I struggle to respond worthily to the call I have received, and for which I am forever grateful.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Faylei,

    I have criticized those religious who according to the NCR article sent back their order's constitution to the Vatican, who lawyered up and then who sought media attention to decry the visitation as an inquisition, paint themselves as victims of "the dread male hierarchy," and pledge to defend their dissident positions in the future. THIS CLEARLY DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL RELIGIOUS, NOR DOES IT SAY ALL ARE UNFAITHFUL. Only those who have taken that public, provocative position. As for subsidies, I know of groups of nuns who run programs, workshops, retreat centers which receive funds from various diocesan offices and who inhabit underused buildings at below market prices, etc. Some of these religious also do Reiki and channel "spiritual masters." I don't know how the particular nun (some kind of Dominican) who acted as an abortion clinic escort makes her living. As for the CCHD, I saw that claim on another blog and will virtually retrace my steps.

    Thank you for serving God in your vocation. Would that there were more God-serving religious in the world.

    IG

    ReplyDelete
  20. Thanks for your kind words, IG, but I'm not trying to portray myself as any more worthy than others.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Thank you for your kind words, IG, but I'm not trying to portray myself as more worthy than anyone else.

    ReplyDelete

Please THINK before you write
and PRAY before you think!