In the combox on the post Faith and Numbers, Novo wonders if, after saying no to casino gambling, "moderate gambling" might be considered all right as "a form of diversion." Good question!
"All things in moderation" they say: is that true? "All" might include things we wouldn't approve of even in moderation. Most of us would have no problem with someone having a cocktail before dinner but would would draw the line at snorting a line of coke as an appetizer. How about gambling? Is a moderate amount of gambling as entertainment, a diversion, ok?
Another blogger in the Archdiocese (Cardinal Sean O'Malley) has an opinion on this. You might want to check out the whole post in which he writes about the situation in Middleborough:
Like most Americans, I am very sympathetic to our Native Americans who in so many cases have been unjustly deprived of ancestral lands and resources. I realize that the government has attempted to compensate them by giving them privileges with regard to gambling. But I am opposed to that project and hope that Middleborough will not approve the proposal the town has received.I agree with the Cardinal's take on gambling here but can't help but wonder: is there a word missing in his comments? Can you think of what it is? what's that word? it's on the tip of my tongue... BINGO! That's it! How do we reconcile the reality of BINGO in so many parishes with the Cardinal's wisdom on gambling? To paraphrase: If works and projects in archdiocesan parishes need to be funded, there should be other ways to that, lest relying on gambling make us dependent on that money.
The Church’s stance on gambling is a nuanced one. We believe that gambling can be a legitimate form of recreation, like drinking alcohol. But, like alcohol, there are also dangers involved in gambling. Casino gambling, I believe, is fraught with many dangers for a community. First, it drains the resources away from other businesses and activities in the community. Second, it promotes gambling addiction, which is one of the worst addictions and one that is becoming more common...
If public works and projects in the Commonwealth need to be funded, there should be other ways to do that, perhaps by raising taxes. But relying on casinos makes us gambling junkies, and we become dependent on that money, which will result in many ruined lives, ruined businesses and ruined neighborhoods. So we unequivocally oppose casino gambling in the state.
So, I think that gambling in moderation can be an entertaining diversion but, like many other diversions it has the potential for becoming a vice, an addiction. While a parish might occasionally have an event at which liquor is served or allowed, we'd reject the notion of a Catholic church having a weekly cocktail hour for fundraising purposes. Why do we make different rules for gambling in parochial life? Certainly it's time to rethink BINGO as a source of income for parishes and their schools.
Do you, or does someone you know, have a problem with gambling? Check here for information, answers to questions and help.